Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Francisco Comesana vs Matteo Martineau Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Comesana vs Martineau analysis and find out who is favored!
Francisco Comesana vs Matteo Martineau Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Comesana 0 - 0 Martineau
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Comesana has won 51.25% of points on his second serve, while Martineau has won 50.06%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Comesana, in recent form, has won 48.51% of his opponent's second serve points, while Martineau has won 48.84%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.85% and 30.81% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Comesana has saved 60% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Martineau has saved 62.38% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Comesana has won 69.05% of matches played (W/L 58/ 26), with Martineau winning 59.09% (W/L 52/ 36) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Comesana has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 231/ 117), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Martineau has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 52/ 33), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Comesana has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 74.63% of matches (W/L 50/ 17), where as Martineau has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.61% of matches (W/L 40/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Comesana has played against opponents with an average rank of 299.44 while Martineau has played against players with an average rank of 268.34.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Comesana has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Martineau has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Comesana has converted 37.23% of breakpoint opportunities, and Martineau has converted 42.13% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Comesana 0 - 0 Martineau
91
Rank
91
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
183
Rank
183
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
65% (243-131)
Career Total W/L
56% (271-215)
59% (17-12)
YTD W/L
56% (19-15)
$100,195
Career Prize Money
$32,325
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Francisco Comesana | Matteo Martineau |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (17/12) | 56% (19/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (39/31) | 55% (46/37) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (350/324) | 51% (416/394) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 62% (16/10) | 47% (7/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (12/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.54 |
| Aces Total | 142 | 213 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 69 | 78 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:49 | 1:44:6 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 272.1 | 288.62 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1315/2072) | 69% (1668/2406) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (942/1315) | 72% (1193/1668) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (388/757) | 50% (368/738) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (86/231) | 40% (87/218) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (880/2222) | 37% (927/2519) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 40% (4/6) | 0% (0/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 73% (11/4) | 61% (19/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (17/29) | 56% (19/34) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 50% (7/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 58% (7/12) | 47% (7/15) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (15/14) | 88% (17/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (15/1) | 12% (17/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (14/3) | 24% (17/4) |
Francisco Comesana Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Lucas Pouille
Player
Francisco Comesana
39%
(
26 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(5) 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Filip Misolic
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
47%
(
41 of
87)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Joris De Loore
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
55)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Francisco Comesana
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
63%
(
71 of
112)
1st Serve %
66%
(
72 of
109)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
51 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
109)
106
Total Points Won
115
|
6-4 1-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Francisco Comesana
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Andrea Vavassori
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Ugo Blanchet
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
52 of
93)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Jaime Faria
75%
(
62 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
63 of
113)
6
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
47 of
63)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
27%
(
22 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
113)
106
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Matteo Martineau Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Matteo Martineau
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
73%
(
55 of
75)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Henri Squire
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
10
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Matteo Martineau
37%
(
33 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
4
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
52%
(
29 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Matteo Martineau
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
106)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
106)
102
Total Points Won
99
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Dellien
Player
Matteo Martineau
80%
(
73 of
91)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucas Miedler
Player
Matteo Martineau
64%
(
69 of
108)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
94)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
50 of
69)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
37%
(
40 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
94)
101
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luca Nardi
Player
Matteo Martineau
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Comesana Vs Martineau Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
